China Semiconductor Equipment Market 2026: Scale, Competition, and Localization Roadmap

Abstract

Semiconductor equipment is the tooling that makes chips possible — and in China's technology supply chain, it is simultaneously the sector most deeply "choked" by import dependence and the hottest front for domestic substitution. A single 5nm volume-production line requires hundreds of process steps — lithography, etch, deposition, diffusion, CMP, clean, ion implantation, metrology — each relying on one or more highly specialized tools. China is now the world's largest wafer-fab expansion market, with the Chinese semiconductor equipment market reaching approximately $40 billion in 2024 and surging to approximately $49.3 billion in 2025 (+23%), accounting for roughly 43% of the global total, the single largest national market and growing its share. (Source: SEMI regional data) Yet the most critical process steps — EUV lithography, advanced etch, ALD atomic-layer deposition, high-end metrology — remain firmly in the hands of five overseas giants: ASML (Netherlands), Applied Materials (AMAT, US), Lam Research (US), Tokyo Electron (TEL, Japan), and KLA (US), with a combined market share of approximately 75%–80%.

Domestic equipment localization rates show severe "staircase" stratification (FY2025 actuals): photoresist stripping ≥65%–70%, single-wafer cleaning ≥50%–55% — subsectors where Chinese vendors have reached global front ranks; etch ≈30%–35%, CMP ≈28%–35%, PVD ≈20%–25% — rapidly catching up; PECVD ≈18%–22%, ALD ≈8%–12%, coater-developer ≈10%–12%, metrology/inspection ≈12%–15% — still in early breakthrough phase; and lithography <5%, the single point of greatest technology generation gap in the entire chain. This structure defines the sector's core contradiction: some subsegments are already a matter of "when, not if" for domestic substitution; others require a generational leap, not incremental progress.

The National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund Phase III ("Big Fund III"), established in May 2024 at RMB 344 billion (~$47 billion), is the largest semiconductor-focused national investment fund in Chinese history, targeted at equipment, materials, EDA, and advanced process nodes. Simultaneously, the US Export Administration Regulations (EAR) have been progressively tightened since October 2022, blocking export of key equipment required for sub-14nm nodes; in 2024, the Netherlands further restricted ASML's DUV export licenses to China. This policy "push" combined with regulatory "constraint" forms the most powerful structural driver for semiconductor equipment localization.

Core conclusions:

• The "staircase" of localization rates is the key to understanding the sector. Stripping/cleaning (50%+) is already won; etch/deposition is the main battlefield — FY2025 etch domestic rate reached 30%–35%, advancing toward 40%–45%; lithography is the hardest chokepoint — SMEE's most advanced product covers ~90nm (non-immersion DUV), still over one generation behind 14nm, ~10 years behind EUV.
• NAURA (002371) + AMEC (688012) + ACM Research Shanghai (688082) form the "Big Three" of domestic equipment, with combined domestic market share of ~45%–50%, already integrated into SMIC, HHGrace, and YMTC volume production supply chains.
• Big Fund III is a super-catalyst, but not magic. First-unit subsidies (30%–50% of equipment price) reduce the risk for fabs adopting domestic equipment, but process window matching takes time, and iteration speed depends on engineering talent density.
• Upstream components are the hidden chokepoint. RF power supplies (~20% domestic), precision valves (VAT Group ~60%–70% global share, domestic <10%), quartz parts, precision ceramics — these non-tool components face the same EAR restrictions but receive far less attention than complete tools.
• 2030 forecast range: global semiconductor equipment ~$140–170B; China market ~$52–63B; domestic equipment revenue ~RMB 150–200B; lithography domestic rate 2030E optimistic ~10%, etch ~44%+, clean ~65%+.

Key Data Summary (FY2025 update):

• Global semiconductor equipment 2025E ~$115B (SEMI); China mainland ~$49.3B (+23%, ~43% of global); 2030E ~$140–170B, CAGR ~7%–10%.
• Domestic localization rate FY2025 ~18%–23% (1Q25 measured 18%), up sharply from ~12%–15% in 2024.
• Overseas Big Five FY2025: ASML €32.7B (+16%); AMAT ~$28.4B (+26%); Lam ~$18.4B (+24%); TEL ~¥2.43T (+33%); KLA ~$12.16B (+13%).
• Chinese Big Three FY2025: NAURA RMB 39.35B (+31.9%); AMEC RMB 12.39B (+37%); ACM Shanghai RMB 6.79B (+21%). Piotech RMB 6.52B (+59%) joins the top tier.
• Big Fund III RMB 344B; deployed >RMB 164B in 2025; SMIC FY2025 capex $8.1B; HHGrace FY2025 revenue $2.4B.

---

Chapter 1　Definitions, Classification, and Industry Chain Overview

1.1　The Essence of Semiconductor Equipment: Precision Tools for Chip Manufacturing

Chip manufacturing is one of the highest-precision, most process-complex mass-production activities in all of human industry. On a silicon wafer the size of a fingernail, modern advanced processes must pattern billions of transistors, each with dimensions between 5nm and 28nm. This is accomplished entirely by semiconductor equipment. Semiconductor equipment is the collective term for the specialized mechanical and process tools required to manufacture integrated circuits, running from the very first wafer processing step to the final packaging and testing operation.

Unlike general-purpose machine tools or welding equipment, semiconductor equipment is highly dedicated: each type can only perform a specific physical or chemical process step, and no two types are interchangeable. Precision requirements typically reach the nanometer scale, and tools must operate in cleanroom environments where even microscopic particles can scrap a wafer. This combination of extreme specialization and extreme precision makes semiconductor equipment one of the highest-barrier subsectors in capital equipment manufacturing — developing a new etch or lithography tool can require over ten years of continuous investment and thousands of patents.

A modern 12-inch wafer fab houses dozens of equipment types; a single high-end tool such as an EUV scanner costs over €200 million. Equipment investment typically accounts for 70%–80% of total fab capital expenditure, meaning that a single advanced-process line with monthly capacity of 50,000 wafers involves equipment purchases in the tens of billions of dollars. This investment density establishes semiconductor equipment suppliers as the central node in the entire semiconductor value chain.

1.2　Front-End Equipment: Eight Major Process Steps from Lithography to Metrology

Semiconductor manufacturing is conventionally divided into front-end (wafer fabrication, FEOL) and back-end (packaging and test, BEOL). The front end is where equipment value is most concentrated, corresponding to the formation of circuit patterns on the wafer.

Lithography

Lithography is the core step in semiconductor manufacturing and the single equipment category with the highest technical barriers. A lithography scanner projects the chip design pattern through an optical system onto the photoresist-coated wafer surface; after exposure and development, the circuit pattern is formed. Light source wavelength determines the resolution limit: shorter wavelengths enable finer feature sizes.

The mainstream lithography roadmap runs from 365nm I-Line and 248nm KrF (krypton fluoride excimer laser) through today's mainstream 193nm ArF immersion DUV (deep-ultraviolet, liquid immersion) and on to the most advanced 13.5nm EUV (extreme-ultraviolet). The global sole supplier of EUV scanners is ASML (Netherlands), with standard EUV ASPs of approximately €200M and High-NA EUV approximately €350M. EUV is a required tool for sub-7nm nodes, and is completely unavailable to China's mainland fabs (blocked by Dutch export license controls).

Etch

Etch transfers the photolithographically formed patterns into the underlying material layers; it is divided into dry etch (plasma etch) and wet etch (chemical solution). Advanced processes rely primarily on dry etch: ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma) and CCP (Capacitively Coupled Plasma). Etch tools are the second-largest category in the global equipment market (~15%–18%), and are also the advanced tool category in which Chinese domestic progress has been fastest — AMEC's CCP etch is in TSMC's 5nm/7nm volume lines, and NAURA's ICP etch has been qualified at SMIC's 14nm.

Thin-Film Deposition

Deposition tools lay down thin films on the wafer — conductive metal layers, insulating dielectric layers, semiconducting polysilicon. Key process routes include:

• CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition): PECVD, LPCVD, SACVD
• ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition): deposits one atomic layer at a time; key for sub-7nm
• PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition): primarily metal films (Cu, W, Al, Ti) via sputtering

Deposition is the equipment category with the most sub-types and most complex process chemistry. Applied Materials (AMAT) leads globally in deposition tools; Chinese players include Piotech (688072) in PECVD/ALD and NAURA in CVD/PVD.

Diffusion and Oxidation

High-temperature thermal processes including thermal oxidation (gate SiO₂ growth), anneal (lattice defect removal), and diffusion. Rapid Thermal Processing (RTP) tools are increasingly prevalent as thermal budgets shrink. Domestic leaders include NAURA and Mattson (ACM/Mattson, 688228) for RTP.

CMP (Chemical Mechanical Planarization)

CMP planarizes the wafer surface through combined chemical attack and mechanical abrasion, providing a flat starting point for each subsequent lithography step. Multi-level metallization processes require one CMP step after each deposition layer; CMP tool count therefore scales with process layer count. Domestic CMP is dominated by CXMT/Huahai Qingke (688120), whose UniForce series has passed volume qualification at SMIC, HHGrace, and YMTC.

Cleaning

Wafer cleaning is the most frequently repeated front-end step, removing surface contaminants, particles, and chemical residues every few process steps. Main tool types: single-wafer spin cleaners (for advanced process, sub-28nm) and batch slot cleaners (for mature process). Cleaning is the advanced-process category with the highest domestic localization rate; ACM Research Shanghai's SAPS (Space Alternated Phase Shift) and Kingsemi (688037) are the domestic leaders.

Ion Implantation

Ion implantation bombards the silicon surface with high-energy beams of dopant ions (B, P, As) to form P-type or N-type doped regions — a key CMOS process step. Technical barriers are extremely high; the global market is dominated by AMAT's VIISTA series. China's Wafer Works (万业企业, 600641) is pursuing localization through acquisition of Intevac implant technology, but domestic penetration is ~10%, still in early-stage qualification.

Metrology and Inspection

Metrology/inspection tools monitor critical dimensions, film thickness, and defect density throughout the fab, serving as the "eyes" of process control. The global market is dominated by KLA (~50%+ share); Hitachi High-Tech leads in CD-SEM. Domestic players include CXMT/Fei Ce (688361) in optical inspection and Jingyuan Electronics (300567) in electrical test. Overall domestic metrology localization is <10%, the largest remaining gap versus overseas tools.

1.3　Back-End Equipment: Packaging and Test

Back-end equipment covers packaging (dicing, die attach, wire bonding, molding) and test (wafer-level ATE, finished device test). Back-end tools are less sensitive to leading-edge process nodes and are relatively easier to localize. Changchuan Technology (300604) leads domestically in ATE and handlers; Japan's Disco commands ~80% global share in dicing and grinding.

With advanced packaging (Fan-out WLP, TSV, HBM stacking) driven by Chiplet architectures, front-end tools (CMP, deposition, etch, clean) are increasingly required in packaging flows, blurring the front/back boundary.

1.4　Full Industry Chain: Upstream Components → Midstream Tools → Downstream Fabs

The semiconductor equipment supply chain has three layers:

Upstream: Key Components and Materials

• Vacuum systems: pumps (Edwards UK, Pfeiffer Vacuum DE), valves (VAT Group Switzerland, ~60%–70% global share)
• RF power supplies: MKS Instruments US, Advanced Energy US
• Quartz parts/tubes: Heraeus DE, Shin-Etsu JP
• Precision ceramics: Kyocera JP, CoorsTek US
• Specialty gases: Linde DE, Air Products US
• Photoresist: Shin-Etsu, JSR, Sumitomo Chemical JP (ArF)
• Photomasks: HOYA JP, Toppan JP
• CMP slurry/pads: CMC Materials US, DuPont US

These upstream components are often explicitly covered by US EAR export controls, forming a hidden chokepoint chain.

Midstream: Complete Equipment Tools

Equipment integrators are the core value-creation node, assembling hundreds of upstream components into complete process tools. Globally, ASML/AMAT/Lam/TEL/KLA dominate absolutely; in China, listed companies NAURA, AMEC, ACM Research Shanghai, Huahai Qingke, and others are rapidly catching up.

Downstream: Wafer Fabs and OSAT

Downstream customers are China's foundries (SMIC, HHGrace, YMTC, CXMT, Ingenic) and OSAT (JCET, Tianshui Huatian, Tongfu Microelectronics). Downstream capex directly determines equipment demand volumes; China mainland fab capex was approximately $25–30B in 2024, with 70%–80% going to equipment.

1.5　Semiconductor Equipment in the Full Semiconductor Value Chain

In the full chain from IC design → mask → wafer fab → OSAT → end electronics, wafer fab is the most value-dense segment, and equipment is the single largest cost item in the fab. The global semiconductor equipment market at $109B in 2024, combined with the global materials market ($70B), totals over $170B, supporting a global semiconductor product market of ~$600B.

For China, with equipment design (HiSilicon, Verisilicon), materials (silicon wafers, photoresist), and equipment (NAURA, AMEC) all advancing simultaneously, semiconductor equipment localization has become the single most-watched strategic metric in the "de-Americanization" supply chain agenda.

1.6　Equipment Category Market Share Structure

By global market share (SEMI), approximate category mix:

• Lithography: ~20%–22%
• Etch: ~18%–20%
• Thin-film deposition (CVD/ALD/PVD combined): ~25%–28%
• Metrology/inspection: ~12%–14%
• Clean: ~6%–8%
• Ion implant: ~5%–6%
• Diffusion/thermal: ~4%–5%
• Other (CMP, coater-developer, back-end tools): ~12%–15%

Deposition has the broadest sub-type count and largest total market; lithography has the highest per-unit price (especially EUV); etch is the "golden track" balancing technical moats and market scale. Chinese domestic equipment players have made material commercial breakthroughs in clean, etch, deposition, and CMP — categories that together account for ~55%–60% of the global equipment market, making them the main battleground for domestic substitution.

1.7　Summary

The classification logic of semiconductor equipment defines the domestic substitution roadmap: cleaning/stripping (barriers relatively lower) has already exceeded 50% domestically; etch/deposition is in rapid-catch-up mode; metrology/inspection and lithography remain the two hardest mountains to climb. Upstream component dependence should not be overlooked — RF power supplies, precision valves, and photoresist face the same export control constraints as complete tools but receive far less attention. Subsequent chapters will dissect each layer of competition, corporate landscape, and technology evolution along this chain.

---

Chapter 2　Global Landscape and the Five Overseas Giants

2.1　Global Semiconductor Equipment Market Scale and Regional Distribution

The global semiconductor equipment market entered an accelerated growth channel from 2020, driven by three concurrent forces: global fab capacity expansion, rising per-tool value as process nodes advance, and China mainland's strategic localization investment.

According to SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International), global semiconductor equipment billings first surpassed $100B in 2021, reached ~$107.6B in 2022, pulled back to ~$100.7B in 2023 due to the global memory inventory digestion cycle, and recovered to ~$109B in 2024 as AI chip demand accelerated and China mainland purchasing surged. Looking toward 2030, mainstream institutions forecast a range of approximately $140–170B, with CAGR of ~7%–10%.

In regional terms, China mainland has become the single largest national semiconductor equipment market, leading globally in 2023–2024 with ~$40B in annual purchases, approximately 37% of the global total. Korea (Samsung/SK Hynix), Taiwan (TSMC/UMC), and Japan each account for ~15%–20%; North America and Europe each ~10%.

2.2　Market Concentration: The Five-Power Oligopoly

The global semiconductor equipment market exhibits a textbook oligopoly. The five overseas giants — ASML (Netherlands), Applied Materials (AMAT, US), Lam Research (US), Tokyo Electron (TEL, Japan), and KLA (US) — together command ~75%–80% market share. These five companies each hold near-monopoly positions in their respective primary categories; their products are highly complementary with minimal direct competition among them, collectively forming the "operating system" of global advanced wafer fabrication.

No fab can maintain sub-14nm volume production without the core tools from all five. This is both the source of their pricing power and the most fundamental structural constraint on China mainland's semiconductor equipment localization.

2.3　ASML: The Sole Gatekeeper of EUV Lithography

ASML occupies a unique position in the global semiconductor equipment industry. As the world's sole supplier of EUV lithography scanners, ASML holds a true technology monopoly in the lithography step, with no competitor capable of offering an alternative in any foreseeable horizon.

Financials: 2024 revenue €28.2B (+13% YoY), net profit ~€7.4B; EUV ASP ~€200M per unit; High-NA EUV (NA=0.55, required for sub-2nm nodes) ~€350M; DUV immersion scanners still ~45% of revenue.

Technology moat: EUV barriers stem from multiple interdependent sub-systems — 13.5nm EUV light generation (Cymer laser-produced plasma source), ultra-precision reflective optics (Carl Zeiss multi-layer EUV mirrors), vacuum chamber, and precision motion control — each the product of 20–30 years of accumulated development, impossible to replicate from scratch in the short term. ASML began EUV R&D in the late 1990s, invested ~€6B over ~20 years, and shipped the first commercial EUV tool in 2018.

China situation: China mainland clients accounted for ~26% of ASML 2023 revenue (historic peak), but the Dutch government, under US pressure, successively restricted export licenses for certain DUV models (TWINSCAN NXT:2000i and above) in late 2023 and 2024; the mainland share fell to ~15% in 2024. ASML has never sold a single EUV scanner to China mainland.

Outlook: High-NA EUV (NA=0.55) is the next-generation mainstream, with TSMC and Samsung beginning adoption in 2024 for sub-2nm node R&D. ASML's 2025 revenue guidance of ~€300–350B reflects long-term tailwinds from global fab capex expansion, with shrinking China business as the primary risk.

2.4　Applied Materials (AMAT): The Broadest Product-Line Equipment Giant

Applied Materials has the widest product line of any semiconductor equipment company, covering deposition (CVD/ALD/PVD), etch, metrology, CMP, and ion implantation (VIISTA series).

Financials: FY2024 (ended Oct. 2024) revenue $27.7B (+2% YoY), net profit ~$7B; China mainland revenue historically ~30%+ (2023 peak), compressed by controls in 2024.

Competitive advantages: AMAT's Producer series CVD/ALD systems are the industry standard; the Endura PVD platform is essential for copper interconnect metallization; the SEMVision and SIMS/OCD metrology tools are important alongside KLA. AMAT is also the world's largest CMP system supplier and the leading ion implant tool vendor (VIISTA).

Control impact: BIS designated multiple AMAT tools as subject to China export controls in October 2023, including ALD, PVD, and CVD systems for sub-14nm processes. Sales to mainland China were significantly restricted, though mature-node (≥28nm) tools remain partially exportable.

2.5　Lam Research: Dual Driver of Etch and Thin-Film Deposition

Lam's core competencies span dry-etch tools (Kiyo CCP, Flex ICP) and deposition tools (Altus CVD, ALD), which together account for ~70%–80% of revenue.

Financials: FY2024 (ended Jun. 2024) revenue $14.7B (+6% YoY), operating margin ~27%; China mainland revenue historically ~30%+, declining with 2024 controls.

Position in etch: Lam, AMAT, and TEL together account for ~85%–90% of global etch market share. In 3D NAND manufacturing, etch and deposition step counts scale proportionally with layer count (from 64L to 232L is roughly 3× more steps); Lam is the biggest beneficiary of NAND capex — YMTC was a key customer until its Entity List designation in 2023.

2.6　Tokyo Electron (TEL): Absolute Dominant in Coater-Developer

TEL is Japan's largest semiconductor equipment company, holding ~90% global market share in coater-developer (Track) systems — nearly as irreplaceable as ASML's EUV, since no lithography flow can be completed without TEL's coating and development.

Financials: FY2024 (ended Mar. 2024) revenue ¥2.36 trillion ($15.6B, +~6% YoY), operating margin ~20%; China mainland revenue ~45% of FY2024 total, the highest China exposure among the five, driven mainly by mature-node (≥28nm) expansion.

Product coverage: Beyond coater-developer, TEL supplies etch (Tactras CCP), CVD/ALD (Triase+), clean tools, and thermal/oxidation systems. TEL's deep coupling with ASML — the two tools jointly tune for optimal lithography process window — is its core competitive moat.

2.7　KLA: The Global Leader in Wafer Metrology and Inspection

KLA is the absolute leader in semiconductor metrology and inspection, with core products including broadband plasma (BBP) inspection, defect classification (Zeta), thin-film metrology (Aleris/Atlas), CD-SEM, and optical critical dimension (OCD) measurement.

Financials: FY2024 (ended Jun. 2024) revenue $9.8B (+2% YoY), operating margin ~28%; China mainland revenue ~40% at 2023 peak, compressing to ~30% in 2024 under controls.

Strategic importance of metrology: Metrology/inspection tools serve as "process control" core — each process step's parameter deviation must be captured by metrology tools and fed back into process adjustment. At advanced nodes, metrology step count scales exponentially — a 5nm line requires ~3–5× more metrology steps than a 28nm line, steadily increasing the metrology spend ratio within total fab capex.

Technical moat: KLA's systems depend on high-precision optical/e-beam optics plus decades of accumulated data and machine-learning algorithms (for automatic defect classification). These algorithms require massive real-production data for training, creating extremely high switching cost barriers. Domestic metrology (FCI, Jingyuan Electronics) currently covers mainly ≥28nm process, with significant gaps at advanced nodes.

2.8　Wassenaar Arrangement and US EAR Export Controls

Wassenaar Arrangement: A 1996 multilateral export control regime with 42 member states covering dual-use goods and military items. For semiconductors, member states must apply export license review to tools exceeding certain technical parameter thresholds — EUV scanners are a core controlled object. The Netherlands invokes its domestic implementation of Wassenaar obligations to deny EUV export licenses to China mainland.

US EAR (Export Administration Regulations): BIS's EAR is the strongest enforcement tool for semiconductor controls against China. The October 2022 package included:

• Prohibition on export of advanced tools required for sub-16nm/14nm nodes
• License requirements for tools required for NAND ≥128L and DRAM <18nm
• Extension of "foreign direct product rule" (FDPR) to US persons supporting certain Chinese semiconductor companies
• New Entity List additions including YMTC

From 2023 to 2024, controls continued to expand with Japan (23 equipment categories) and the Netherlands joining the restriction bloc. China mainland now faces not just US unilateral controls but an emerging multilateral technology containment coalition.

2.9　Future Direction of the Five Giants' China Business

All five giants face the same directional pressure — restricting advanced-node tool sales while retaining mature-node business — but with different strategies. ASML has fully exited EUV sales to China and partly restricted DUV; AMAT and Lam maintain limited supply of ≥28nm tools; TEL's coater-developer (no node threshold restriction) remains relatively stable; KLA's metrology aftermarket at Chinese fabs maintains steady service revenue.

Long-term, as China fabs progressively switch to domestic equipment, the five giants' China market share will continue to be displaced — a result of both controls and China's accelerating localization. For the five giants, this means structural attrition of what was previously their most important growth market.

---

Chapter 3　PEST Environment Analysis

3.1　Policy Environment

Big Fund III: The Largest Semiconductor National Fund in History

In May 2024, the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund Phase III was formally established with registered capital of RMB 344 billion (~$47B), the single largest semiconductor-focused fund ever. Fund I (2014, ~RMB 138.7B) focused on chip manufacturing and design; Fund II (2019, ~RMB 204.2B) continued and broadened; Fund III tilts further toward equipment and materials — the most underweighted segments in previous rounds and the deepest chokepoints.

02 Special Project: Systematic R&D Support for Process Equipment

The "Ultra-Large-Scale IC Manufacturing Equipment and Process" special project (02 Special) has been running since 2008 under the Ministry of Science and Technology. It is the systematic national engineering backbone for Chinese semiconductor equipment R&D; NAURA, AMEC, and other leading companies benefited from 02 Special in early product development. The First-Unit Subsidy Policy (30%–50% of equipment price for the first qualified domestic tool brought into a fab) de-risks fab adoption and accelerates commercial rollout.

National IC Industry Development Guidelines

The 2014 National IC Industry Development Guidelines established the foundational framework of "create a national fund + support chain development." The 2020 State Council Policy on Promoting High-Quality IC and Software Industry Development added comprehensive support on tax incentives (10-year tax exemption for advanced-process enterprises), talent policy, and capital. These policies give domestic equipment companies stable long-term policy backing and establish the direction for fabs to preferentially procure domestic equipment.

Export Controls as Reverse-Pressure Driver

US EAR, Dutch export license restrictions, and Japan's controls have combined to form the most direct external policy driver forcing China to accelerate domestic substitution. The escalation path is clear: from restricting the most advanced tools (EUV), to the next tier (immersion DUV), to components (RF power, specialty gases). This trend forces Chinese policy response to evolve from "prefer domestic in procurement" to "full supply-chain self-sufficiency," including components and materials, all receiving additional policy resources.

3.2　Economic Environment

Global Fab Capex Cycle: AI Demand Driving a New Peak

Semiconductor equipment demand intensity is highly correlated with global fab capex, which exhibits strong cyclicality. 2021–2022 was the last capex peak; 2023 saw a pullback due to the memory price collapse; in 2024 AI compute demand (NVIDIA H100/H200 GPUs pulling TSMC CoWoS advanced packaging and HBM orders) reignited capex recovery.

China Mainland Fab Capex: Policy-Driven Plus Mature-Node Expansion

China mainland fab capex was approximately $25–30B in 2024, expanding counter-cyclically against the global downturn, driven by: Big Fund III–supported strategic expansion; SMIC, HHGrace, and Ingenic mature-node (28nm/55nm/110nm) capacity expansion; and CXMT/YMTC rush-purchasing accessible tools before controls tightened. This special context created the 2023–2024 historic peak in China mainland equipment purchasing.

Economic Logic of Domestic Substitution: From Cost Premium to Cost Parity

Early domestic semiconductor equipment carried a performance and reliability gap versus imports, requiring fabs to absorb higher yield risk. But as NAURA, AMEC, and others have iterated through volume-production cycles, some domestic tools at mature nodes have achieved total cost of ownership (TCO) approaching or even below imported counterparts (especially with first-unit subsidy stacking). This economic attractiveness, aligned with policy direction, has accelerated fabs' willingness to adopt domestic tools.

3.3　Social and Talent Environment

The Semiconductor Talent Race: University Expansion and Salary Spiral

China's rapid semiconductor industry expansion has exposed a structural talent gap. Semiconductor equipment engineers — especially process integration engineers, plasma physics specialists, and precision optics engineers — require 5–10 years of hands-on volume-production experience that cannot be rapidly supplied through training programs.

From 2022 onward, Peking University, Tsinghua, Fudan, and USTC each established integrated circuit schools, expanding enrollment in semiconductor-related programs. The Ministry of Education elevated IC as an independent first-level discipline. On the compensation side, equipment engineer salaries roughly doubled in the 2021–2023 expansion phase (versus 2018 levels), attracting back some overseas Chinese engineers who had worked at TSMC, Samsung, and Intel — a critical human capital inflow that meaningfully accelerated the technology catch-up at AMEC, Huahai Qingke, and others.

3.4　Technology Environment

Moore's Law Continuation: Device Node Advances Require Equipment Precision Breakthroughs

Continuing Moore's Law below 28nm increasingly depends on equipment precision limits, not merely transistor density gains. From 14nm to 7nm, lithography moved from single-patterning to multi-patterning (SAQP); from 7nm to 5nm, EUV became mandatory; from 5nm to 2nm, GAA gate-all-around architecture imposes further demands on etch and deposition precision.

EUV: Technology Roadmap Settled; China Catch-Up Path is Long

EUV's indispensability below 7nm is unambiguous. China mainland has essentially zero EUV technology accumulation; SMEE's most advanced product is ~90nm (non-immersion DUV), behind 28nm by more than one generation and behind EUV by approximately 10 years.

Etch and Deposition: Main Battlefield for Domestic Breakthrough

Etch and deposition equipment technology is more decomposable than EUV — ICP/CCP plasma chamber design, RF power control, and gas flow precision can all be incrementally attacked. AMEC's CCP etch entering TSMC's 5nm/7nm production supply chain is the landmark milestone for Chinese domestic tools entering the world's most advanced fab. Piotech's PECVD passing 28nm volume qualification, with ALD under <14nm process verification, represents the main progress trajectory for deposition.

---

Chapter 4　China Market Scale and Operations

4.1　Basic Scale of China's Semiconductor Equipment Market

China mainland's semiconductor equipment market experienced dramatic expansion from 2020–2024. Per SEMI regional sales data, China mainland annual equipment billings grew from ~$18.7B in 2020 to ~$29.6B in 2021, ~$28.2B in 2022, ~$36.6B in 2023, and a projected ~$40B in 2024 (covering all brands — imported and domestic — sold in China mainland, including the equipment unit and key components).

Three distinct metrics must be kept separate to avoid confusion:

• China semiconductor equipment market (~$40B): total sales of all-brand equipment in China mainland — a demand-side figure
• Domestic semiconductor equipment revenue (~RMB 30–35B, ~$4.2–5B): revenue of Chinese-origin equipment companies — a supply-side figure, approximately 1/8–1/10 of demand-side
• Domestic equipment penetration rate: domestic revenue ÷ total China demand — currently ~10%–12% overall, with enormous category variation

These three numbers belong to different analytical frameworks and cannot substitute for each other. China is the world's largest equipment buyer but simultaneously the major chip-producing nation with the lowest domestic equipment penetration — this tension is the sector's core structural contradiction.

4.2　Demand-Side Drivers

Fab capex is the most direct driver. China mainland fab capex in 2024 was approximately $25–30B; equipment procurement accounts for ~70%–80%, corresponding to ~$17.5–24B in equipment demand (including domestic tools).

Drivers of the 2023–2024 capex peak include:

• Big Fund III capital injection plus local government subsidies reducing fab expansion funding costs
• US EAR "rush-procurement" effect — some fabs accelerated purchases of accessible imported advanced tools before restrictions tightened
• Strategic mature-node (28nm/55nm/110nm) capacity expansion for EVs, industrial controls, and IoT domestic demand
• AI/HPC chip demand transmission — Chinese design-side firms routing production through SMIC and HHGrace

Technology node migration is the long-term driver of per-wafer equipment investment intensity. Moving from 28nm to 14nm approximately doubles equipment intensity per wafer area; 14nm to 7nm adds another ~1.5–2×. Although China cannot currently acquire the full set of sub-7nm advanced tools due to controls, the investment intensity at 28nm–14nm nodes is already far above historical mature-node expansion levels.

4.3　Domestic Equipment Penetration by Category: From 65% to Below 5%

Already Broken Through (≥50%)

Photoresist stripping (Ashing) domestic penetration ~65% — the highest domestic penetration of any category. Mattson (Actel, 688228) dominates domestically with ~65% market share; stripping equipment has relatively lower technical barriers (primarily RF plasma-source dependent, no precision optics) and early international competitors exited, leaving space for domestic growth.

Single-wafer cleaning domestic penetration ~50%: ACM Research Shanghai's SAPS/TEBO technology has passed 14nm volume qualification; Kingsemi (688037) also competitive in clean.

Rapidly Catching Up (15%–30%)

Etch tools ~25%: AMEC CCP etch in TSMC 5nm/7nm; NAURA ICP etch qualified at SMIC 14nm; domestic etch at ≥28nm is now mainstream procurement.

PVD ~20%: NAURA PVD series in volume production at SMIC; gap remains vs AMAT in advanced copper interconnect PVD.

CMP ~20%: Huahai Qingke (688120) is the sole domestic scale supplier; UniForce series qualified at SMIC, HHGrace, and YMTC across multiple nodes.

Oxidation/diffusion ~30%: NAURA thermal processing covers 28nm–90nm volume production broadly.

Early Breakthrough Phase (5%–15%)

PECVD ~15%: Piotech (688072) in volume at 28nm; new-gen product for <14nm in customer qualification.

Coater-developer ~10%: Kingsemi is the sole domestic supplier, covering ≥90nm mature process.

ATE ~15%: Changchuan Technology (300604) in digital test and handlers; high-end analog/RF test remains dominated by Teradyne and Advantest.

Ion implant ~10%: Wafer Works (600641) passed partial SMIC node qualification; complete localization remains a multi-year effort.

Deep Chokepoint Zone (<10%)

ALD <5%: Piotech's ALD under <14nm process verification; no domestic solution yet for sub-5nm HKMG ALD.

Metrology/inspection <10%: FCI (688361), Jingyuan Electronics (300567) advancing; KLA's algorithm moats built over decades of global top-fab production data cannot be quickly replicated.

Lithography <**5%**: SMEE is the only domestic lithography vendor; most advanced product ~90nm non-immersion DUV; >10-year technology gap vs global leaders; EUV localization not feasible in foreseeable future.

4.4　Import/Export Trade Structure

China's semiconductor equipment trade runs a persistent and large deficit: imports mainly from Japan (TEL/Disco/Hitachi High-Tech), US (AMAT/Lam/KLA), and Netherlands (ASML); exports of mature-process tools (clean, stripping, some CVD) at far smaller scale.

2024 China semiconductor equipment import value ~$30–35B (est., including components); exports ~$3–5B (domestic tools exported mainly to Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe); net imports ~$25–30B. With US EAR tightening and domestic substitution accelerating, imports are expected to gradually compress (reduced advanced-process imports), while domestic equipment exports will grow as competitiveness improves.

4.5　Industry Profitability Structure and the Domestic Equipment Growth Logic

Listed domestic equipment companies in 2023 shared common characteristics: high revenue growth (NAURA +47.2%, Piotech +87.0%, ACM Research Shanghai +44.1%) with steadily improving margins. Margin improvement derives from two ends: revenue-side, high demand driving utilization; cost-side, rising domestic component substitution rates and scale economies amortizing R&D.

Domestic equipment companies maintain high R&D intensity: NAURA, AMEC, and Piotech's R&D-to-revenue ratios run at 10%–20%, significantly higher than mature international equipment companies (AMAT ~12%–13%, KLA ~15%). This is the necessary investment for the catching-up phase.

The business model differs from conventional manufacturing: semiconductor equipment sales contracts typically accompany long-term service agreements (installation, calibration, spare parts, process support). Service revenue accounts for 20%–30% of total revenue at leading equipment companies (AMAT, Lam ~25%), is stable and predictable, and grows with installed-base expansion — creating strong customer stickiness. Domestic companies' service capabilities and local service networks are improving, and their local-language, faster-response service is a meaningful competitive differentiation vs. overseas vendors.

---

Chapter 5　Supply Chain Breakdown: Upstream Chokepoints and Midstream/Downstream Overview

5.1　Upstream Components: The Hidden Chokepoint Chain

In semiconductor equipment value chains, upstream components often account for 30%–50% of tool cost and are equally high-barrier specialized sub-sectors. Compared with complete tools, upstream component localization challenges are more concealed — they are not the final product, do not appear in media headlines, yet are equally within the scope of US EAR export controls.

5.2　Vacuum Systems: Pumps and Precision Valves

Vacuum pumps: Semiconductor tools (especially etch, CVD, PVD, ion implant) require high-vacuum or ultra-high-vacuum operation chambers. Global high-end vacuum pump market dominated by Edwards (UK, Atlas Copco group), Pfeiffer Vacuum (DE), and Busch (DE), with ~60%–70% combined share. Domestic leaders include Hanz Precision Machinery (002870) and Nepsa, suitable for some mature-node tool configurations; for turbomolecular and cryopumps, domestic penetration is extremely low (high-end dry pumps <10%), remaining highly import-dependent.

Precision vacuum valves: VAT Group (Switzerland, VATN.SW) commands approximately 60%–70% global market share — the deepest single-component chokepoint in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Domestic valve companies (Zhejiang Gutai, Shanghai Zhongxi) are at an early stage for mature-process configurations; high-end chamber valve domestic penetration <10%.

5.3　RF Power Supplies

Plasma-process tools (etch, PECVD, PVD, stripping) require RF power supplies to excite plasma. Global RF power market dominated by Advanced Energy Industries (AEIS), MKS Instruments, and Comdel (all US), ~65%–75% combined share. Domestic players include Ruiqi Microelectronics, Pidian (CAS-affiliated), and Shanghai Shenghuang; overall domestic RF power penetration ~20%, mainly for mature-process tool configurations. High-power (10kW+) RF power for advanced-process etch remains in localization-attack mode.

5.4　Quartz Parts and Precision Ceramics

Quartz parts/tubes: High-purity synthetic quartz (≥99.9999% purity) for chamber liners and reaction tubes in etch, CVD, and diffusion furnaces. Global high-purity quartz market dominated by Heraeus (DE), Shin-Etsu (JP), and Momentive (US), ~70%–80% combined. Domestic Feilihua (002456) has a market in lower-grade quartz tubes; advanced synthetic quartz for etch chamber liners domestic penetration ~30%–40%.

Precision ceramics: High-purity alumina (Al₂O₃) or aluminum nitride (AlN) ceramics for chamber supports, heater stages, and showerhead supports. Global market dominated by Kyocera (JP), CoorsTek (US), and NGK (JP). Domestic penetration ~20%–30%, high-end remains mainly imported from Japan.

5.5　Specialty Gases: High-Purity Process Gas Supply Security

Semiconductor manufacturing uses numerous specialty gases — etch gases (Cl₂, HBr, CF₄), deposition gases (SiH₄, TEOS, WF₆), and clean gases (NF₃) — at purity levels typically 6N (99.9999%), where trace metal ions or moisture can cause device yield failures.

Global specialty gas market dominated by Linde (DE), Air Products (US), and Taiyo Nippon Sanso (JP), ~55%–65% combined. Domestic companies Huate Gas (688268), Nanda Optoelectronics (300346), and Jinhong Gas (688106) have achieved volume supply of commodity gases and some process gases; key high-purity etch gases (HF, WF₆) and ultra-pure rare gases remain heavily imported.

5.6　Photoresist and Photomasks

Photoresist: ArF (193nm) photoresist domestic penetration <10%, almost entirely supplied by Japanese companies (Shin-Etsu, JSR, Sumitomo, Fujifilm); G/I-Line photoresist domestic penetration ~60%–70%; KrF ~30%–40%. ArF photoresist is the most critical photolithography material requiring domestic breakthrough.

Photomasks: Global mask market dominated by HOYA, Toppan, and DNP (Japan), plus S&S Tech (Korea). Domestic Qingyigu Photoelectric (688138) covers mature-process masks; advanced-process ArF mask domestic penetration extremely low.

5.7　CMP Consumables: Slurry and Pads

CMP slurry and pad quality directly affects tool performance. Global CMP consumable market dominated by CMC Materials (acquired by Entegris) and DuPont. Domestic Dinlong (300054) has made progress in CMP pads entering SMIC supply chain; Anji Technology (688019) achieved breakthrough in copper CMP slurry, domestic penetration ~30%–40% — the fastest-moving CMP consumable subsegment, forming a "domestic tool + domestic consumables" substitution combination with Huahai Qingke.

5.8　Midstream: Domestic Equipment Companies' Main Battleground

Equipment integrators are the core value-creation node, assembling hundreds of upstream components into complete process tools and providing process recipe development, engineering support, and after-sales service.

Domestic equipment commercialization is highly concentrated: NAURA + AMEC + ACM Research Shanghai together account for ~45%–50% of domestic equipment market share; the remaining share is distributed among Huahai Qingke, Piotech, FCI, Kingsemi, and other focused-category companies.

The competitive moat in complete tools is not just process capability, but also the long-term relationship with fab process teams ("Qualified Tool" status requires 12–24 months of qualification verification) and the customized service capability optimized for specific fab process routes. Once these relationships are established, switching cost for the fab is extremely high, creating a powerful retention barrier.

5.9　Downstream: Wafer Fabs and OSAT Demand Landscape

SMIC (688981): China's most important logic foundry; 14nm FinFET in volume production, 7nm in R&D (EAR restrictions severely limit related tool procurement). 2023 revenue ~$6.36B (-13%); capex ~$7.5B; annual equipment procurement ~$4–5B — the single most important domestic equipment customer.

HHGrace (688347): Focused on specialty processes (BCD/IGBT power, embedded NVM, RF); 2023 revenue ~$2.29B; HHGrace Wuxi new 12-inch fab expanding.

YMTC (unlisted): China's most advanced 3D NAND manufacturer; 232-layer technology R&D complete. Entity-listed in 2023, cutting off foreign advanced tool procurement; now in accelerated domestic tool adoption phase — the most urgently demanding customer for domestic substitution.

CXMT (unlisted): DRAM focused, ~17nm–19nm volume process; large-scale production still needs substantial additional equipment, a key domestic equipment customer but with high metrology tool requirements.

Ingenic (688368): LCD driver chip (DDIC) foundry; node mainly 40nm–90nm; most active domestic equipment adoption rate among Chinese fabs.

---

Chapter 6　Competitive Landscape and Key Companies

6.1　Overview of China's Domestic Semiconductor Equipment Competitive Landscape

China's domestic semiconductor equipment market competition is a dynamic displacement process — domestic vendors progressively infiltrating a base dominated by overseas giants. Domestic vendors by product-line breadth fall into two types: comprehensive (NAURA, covering etch/CVD/PVD/clean/MOCVD across categories) and specialized (AMEC focused on etch+MOCVD, Huahai Qingke focused on CMP, Piotech focused on PECVD/ALD).

Direct competition among domestic equipment companies is currently limited — each has relatively distinct primary categories, with most competitive pressure coming from import substitution rather than category overlap. But as domestic penetration rates rise and leading companies expand product lines, intra-domestic competition will intensify, especially in mature-process etch/CVD.

6.2　NAURA Technology Group (002371): The Broadest-Category Domestic Equipment Leader

NAURA has the widest category coverage and largest scale among Chinese semiconductor equipment listed companies. Headquartered in Beijing, its semiconductor equipment division covers etch, CVD (SACVD/PECVD/LPCVD), PVD, oxidation/diffusion, clean, and MOCVD.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 12.18B (+47.2%); 2024E >RMB 18B. Net margin ~15%–18%; R&D-to-revenue ~12%–15%.

Technology nodes: ICP etch qualified at SMIC 14nm; PVD covers 14nm–28nm volume lines; CVD/oxidation mainly covers 28nm–90nm. NAURA is the primary domestic equipment supplier for SMIC, HHGrace, and YMTC.

Strategic advantages: Three-part moat — broadest categories (can offer fabs a "one-stop domestic solution"), deepest customer relationships (decades-long partnership with SMIC), and strong R&D (~RMB 1.8B R&D in 2023). NAURA's controlling shareholder is Beijing State-owned Assets Supervision, providing policy resource access advantage.

6.3　Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment (AMEC, 688012): The Global Etch Breakthrough

AMEC is one of China's most globally competitive semiconductor equipment companies, having achieved the most important milestone for domestic tools entering the world's most advanced fab — CCP etch in TSMC's 7nm and 5nm volume production lines.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 6.26B (+32.1%); etch tools ~70% of revenue, MOCVD ~20%, rest services. Net margin ~18%–22%, the highest among domestic equipment companies.

Etch: AMEC's Primo CCP series covers both silicon and dielectric etch; the CCP etch is now in TSMC's 5nm/7nm production lines — the first Chinese domestic equipment tool to enter the world's most advanced fab's volume production, a landmark whose strategic significance far exceeds its current commercial scale. Domestically, AMEC etch is an indispensable component of SMIC's 14nm process.

MOCVD: AMEC's Prismo series MOCVD (metal-organic CVD for LED/compound semiconductor epitaxy) dominates the domestic LED manufacturing market with ~60%–70% market share — one of few complete localization cases in equipment for LED.

6.4　ACM Research Shanghai (688082/ACMR): Top-5 Global in Clean Equipment

ACM Research Shanghai specializes in single-wafer cleaning tools, the absolute domestic leader in the highest-penetration advanced-equipment category, and the only Chinese semiconductor equipment company simultaneously listed on NASDAQ (ACMR) and Shanghai STAR Market.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 5.63B (+44.1%); cleaning ~65% of revenue, ECD ~15%, rest includes PECVD new products.

SAPS technology: ACM's core competency is "SAPS" (Space Alternated Phase Shift) cleaning and TEBO (Timely Eco-friendly Bubble Ozone) — delivering strong physical cleaning via phase-shift megasonic waves and ozone bubbles with low chemical consumption. SAPS 2.0 has passed 14nm volume qualification and continues attack on <7nm process adaptation.

Diversification: ACM has expanded into PECVD (competing with Piotech) and electroplating (copper interconnect), extending from cleaning into deposition and electrochemical processes. The company has R&D or sales operations in the US, Singapore, and Korea — one of the most internationally-oriented Chinese equipment companies.

6.5　Huahai Qingke (688120): The Sole Domestic CMP Solution

Huahai Qingke is the only domestic company producing CMP (Chemical Mechanical Planarization) tools at scale, achieving a domestic breakthrough from zero to commercialization in a category globally dominated by Applied Materials and Ebara.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 1.87B (+43.0%); net margin ~22%–25%, one of the strongest unit-category profitability records among domestic equipment companies.

UniForce series: UniForce 300 CMP system has entered SMIC (14nm/28nm), HHGrace (specialty process), and YMTC (3D NAND multi-layer) volume supply chains, completing 2–3 years of volume stability verification — the most important commercial milestone in domestic CMP to date.

Consumable ecosystem: Huahai Qingke is advancing CMP consumable (pad, slurry) co-development with Dinlong (pads) and Anji Technology (slurry), building toward an integrated "domestic tool + domestic consumables" solution.

6.6　Piotech (688072): Thin-Film Deposition Specialist

Piotech focuses on PECVD and ALD tools — the most important attacker in the deposition localization front.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 2.33B (+87.0%), the fastest revenue growth among domestic equipment companies, reflecting the phase of prior R&D investment converting to revenue.

PECVD/ALD progress: Piotech's PECVD (Polaris-U300) has achieved 28nm volume qualification at multiple Chinese fabs; new-gen PECVD for <14nm in customer verification; ALD in early-stage <14nm customer introduction — the company's most important future growth driver.

6.7　China Electronics Technology Fei Ce (FCI, 688361): Domestic Metrology Breakthrough

FCI (founded with CAS Institute of Microelectronics background) focuses on wafer defect inspection and critical-dimension metrology — the highest-technology-grade listed company in China's metrology track.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 980M (+45.7%); small scale but fast growth.

Product lines: Brightfield optical inspection, darkfield optical inspection, film thickness metrology, OCD (optical CD) measurement. Current products mainly cover ≥28nm; advanced (<14nm) metrology tools in R&D/qualification phase.

6.8　Jingyuan Electronics (300567): Multi-Track Inspection Equipment

Jingyuan started in flat-panel display inspection (AOI) and has expanded rapidly into semiconductor inspection (electrical test, optical inspection) while retaining display AOI — a "display + semiconductor" dual-track portfolio.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 2.16B; semiconductor inspection share growing to ~30%–35%.

6.9　Wafer Works (600641): Ion Implant Domestic Breakthrough

Wafer Works is a listed company that pivoted from legacy businesses to a semiconductor equipment investment platform. It advanced ion implant localization through acquisition of Intevac implant technology and integration with domestic R&D teams. Domestic ion implant tools have passed partial SMIC node technical qualification; overall domestic penetration ~10%, among the slowest-advancing categories.

6.10　Mattson (Actel, 688228): The Stripping Hidden Champion

Mattson (Actel) in photoresist stripping (Ashing) and RTP holds domestic market share of ~65% in stripping — the highest single-category domestic penetration of any semiconductor equipment type. Early accumulation of process recipes and customer relationships through acquisition of Mattson Technology US business accelerated commercialization — a model of M&A-driven technology acquisition then domestic re-engineering.

6.11　Jinsheng Electromechanical (300316): Crystal Growth and Substrate Equipment

Jinsheng's core capability is the Czochralski crystal growth furnace — ~50%–60% domestic market share for solar-grade Czochralski furnaces (world's largest), with rapid extension into semiconductor-grade Czochralski furnaces, sapphire (LED substrate), and SiC (new-energy power device substrate) crystal furnaces.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 7.41B (+19.4%); PV equipment still largest revenue segment; semiconductor equipment ~15%–20%, growing fast.

Strategic significance: Semiconductor silicon wafers are the starting material for all semiconductor manufacturing; Jinsheng's semiconductor-grade Czochralski furnaces support domestic silicon wafer companies (Shanghai Silicon, Shuangliang), forming the upstream anchor of the semiconductor materials domestic supply chain.

6.12　Kingsemi (688037): The Only Domestic Coater-Developer Supplier

Kingsemi is the only domestic volume-production supplier of coater-developer (Track) and single-wafer cleaning tools, directly targeting TEL's CLEAN TRACK product line.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 1.64B (+43.1%); coater-developer ~50%, cleaning ~30%.

Coater-developer importance: Coater-developer is paired with the lithography scanner (pre-coat, post-develop). TEL holds ~90% global share; Kingsemi covers ≥90nm mature process; advanced process (<28nm) coater-developer is under attack but the gap vs TEL remains significant.

6.13　Changchuan Technology (300604): IC Testing Equipment Domestic Leader

Changchuan focuses on IC test equipment (ATE) and handlers, covering digital test, RF test, and memory test — the largest listed ATE company in China.

Financials: 2023 revenue ~RMB 1.56B; test machines ~50%, handlers ~30%.

Competitive landscape: Global ATE market dominated by Teradyne (US) and Advantest (JP), ~60%–70% combined share. Changchuan has achieved domestic breakthrough in digital logic testers; advanced analog/RF/SoC test gaps vs international giants remain significant.

---

Chapter 7　Regional Clusters and the Factory Identification Landscape

7.1　Geographic Clusters of China's Semiconductor Equipment Industry

China's semiconductor equipment industry geography is highly concentrated, centered on Shanghai and Beijing as two core nodes, supplemented by regional clusters in Hefei, Wuxi, Shenyang, and Xi'an. This geographic pattern reflects both historical accumulation (Beijing has the densest concentration of research institutes) and the industrial logic of downstream fab-driven clustering (Shanghai hosts SMIC's most important 12-inch lines).

7.2　Shanghai Cluster: AMEC, ACM Research, Kingsemi, and Huahai's Main Battlefield

Shanghai Pudong New Area (Zhangjiang Science City and surroundings) is the single most dense location for Chinese semiconductor equipment companies, hosting AMEC, ACM Research Shanghai, Kingsemi, and Huahai Qingke's Shanghai operations, alongside SMIC (Shanghai Zhangjiang/Lingang) and Huali Microelectronics (HHGrace subsidiary).

The walking-distance proximity between equipment companies and downstream fabs dramatically reduces the communication cost for process qualification. Shanghai's annual IC industry output has surpassed RMB 200B (including design, manufacturing, OSAT, equipment, and materials), making it a globally significant semiconductor industrial cluster. Pudong R&D subsidies, equipment procurement incentives, and talent settlement green channels reinforce Shanghai's attraction for top equipment companies.

7.3　Beijing Cluster: NAURA, FCI, and Piotech

Beijing's cluster centers on Beijing Economic and Technology Development Area (Yizhuang), where NAURA's headquarters and main R&D base are co-located within minutes of SMIC's Beijing fab — a physical proximity that provides meaningful efficiency advantages during tool qualification.

FCI leverages the academic base of CAS Institute of Microelectronics for R&D and industrialization in Beijing; Piotech has its main R&D center in Beijing for PECVD/ALD. Beijing also concentrates substantial semiconductor equipment upstream R&D resources (Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhongguancun IC Design Park) and defense/aerospace precision machinery manufacturers (AVIC, CETC) who provide machining and precision optics support.

7.4　Shenyang Cluster: Northeast Old Industrial Base's New Track

Shenyang and Liaoning hold China's most complete heavy equipment manufacturing foundation; precision machine tool and metallurgical equipment process know-how provides a platform for semiconductor equipment component manufacturing. Mattson (Actel) has a production base in Shenyang, leveraging Northeast machining capability and relatively lower manufacturing costs.

7.5　Hefei Cluster: CXMT and Ingenic-Driven Supply Chain

Hefei's semiconductor equipment cluster rose primarily on downstream fab pull: CXMT (DRAM, Hefei main production base) and Ingenic (DDIC foundry, 12-inch mature process) equipment purchases attract equipment companies and component suppliers to the Hefei area. Hefei University of Technology and USTC provide engineering talent; the city government's "IC + Display + Auto + HeFei" strategy gives priority support to semiconductor equipment.

7.6　Wuxi Cluster: CRNC, SK Hynix, and Fab Ecosystem

Wuxi is an important wafer manufacturing base in East China; CRNC Power (power device foundry), HHGrace Wuxi (12-inch mature process), and SK Hynix (DRAM foreign foundry) all have major capacity there. SK Hynix's long-term local presence has incubated a cohort of local precision machining, gas-line, and cleanroom construction companies that are now pivoting to support domestic semiconductor equipment component supply chains.

7.7　Xi'an Cluster: Samsung Xi'an and Western Semiconductor Support

Xi'an is the most important semiconductor manufacturing center in western China; Samsung's Xi'an fab (NAND flash) is the largest foreign fab in the Northwest. Xi'an Institute of Microelectronics Technology (aerospace sector) and Xi'an University of Electronic Science and Technology provide engineering talent and technical base.

Xi'an's semiconductor equipment support companies primarily cover packaging/test equipment and vacuum technology components; before commercial scale in front-end complete tools, Xi'an serves as an important supplementary source for semiconductor equipment components.

7.8　National Semiconductor Equipment and Component Company Map: The Real Factory Identification Challenge

China's national semiconductor equipment industrial map is far more than the dozen or so listed leading companies. By incomplete estimates, domestic semiconductor equipment and component companies — including unlisted ones — total over 300, of which complete-tool makers number ~80–100 and component suppliers over 200, scattered across industrial parks in Shanghai, Beijing, Hefei, Wuxi, Shenyang, Shenzhen, and Suzhou.

These 200+ component suppliers — providing vacuum pump seals, high-purity aluminum chamber blanks, quartz part semi-finished goods, precision RF connectors, and specialty gas-line valves — operate at revenues of tens of millions to hundreds of millions of RMB each. They are not listed, and do not fully appear under "semiconductor equipment" industry codes in standard business registration databases. Some are registered as "mechanical manufacturing," "electronic components," or even "new materials" — while their actual products are precision machined parts for semiconductor tool components.

This is the genuine factory identification challenge in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. From the B2B sales and procurement decision standpoint, distinguishing which of hundreds of companies claiming to cover "semiconductor-grade precision components" truly have cleanroom-capable machining, truly supply equipment integrators — versus which are merely registered shells — is the real operational challenge for procurement managers.

Tianxia Gongchang (www.tianxiagongchang.com), powered by its database of approximately 4.8 million verified in-production factories, can accurately distinguish real in-production factories with semiconductor-grade component capabilities (vacuum pump body machined-parts shops, high-purity aluminum chamber casting mills, quartz part precision finishing shops) from shells that have registration but no actual capacity — providing genuine factory intelligence for upstream supply chain screening and supplier development in the semiconductor equipment industry, with direct practical value at a time when policy is driving localization acceleration and equipment companies urgently need to find domestic substitutes for imported components.

7.9　Cluster Effects and the Internal Logic of Accelerating Localization

The formation of semiconductor equipment industry clusters is not purely policy-driven; it has deep economic rationale.

Physical proximity economics in tool qualification: New tools being qualified at a fab require frequent engineer round trips and tool tuning sessions. NAURA's Yizhuang base is under 20 minutes from SMIC's Beijing fab — this physical proximity provides meaningful efficiency advantages during the qualification period.

Talent pooling and knowledge spillover: Engineering talent tends to circulate within high-density industry clusters (tends to re-employ in the same city after leaving). Equipment companies, fabs, and research institutes in the same city form a cycle of knowledge spillover and skill accumulation across organizations, accelerating the overall ecosystem's technology maturity.

Accessibility of support services: Cleanroom construction, ultra-pure water/specialty gas supply, precision machining, and logistics are more accessible and lower-cost within industrial clusters. These seemingly minor details have real aggregate cost significance in actual volume production.

---

Chapter 8　Sub-Market Deep Dives

8.1　Lithography: Highest Technical Barriers, Slowest Domestic Progress

EUV is the mandatory tool for sub-7nm nodes, with ASML as sole global supplier. SMEE (Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment) is the only domestic lithography vendor; its most advanced product SSB600 series (~90nm non-immersion DUV) has achieved commercial volume production, serving mature-process applications (packaging lithography, LED manufacturing, sensor chips). The production of SSB600 proves domestic capability to build a DUV scanner, but 90nm is still two generations behind 28nm and three behind 14nm, let alone EUV.

SMEE's core technical challenge is the projection objective (high-NA projection lens): immersion DUV for 28nm requires NA≥1.35, while SMEE's current product is ~0.57–0.65 NA. Self-developed projection objectives have not yet achieved the precision for sub-28nm nodes. Industry consensus: without significant external technology support, SMEE will need at minimum 5–8 years to achieve commercial volume production of a 28nm immersion DUV scanner. This is the most pessimistic single-point prediction in the entire domestic equipment localization map.

8.2　Etch: The Most Important Advanced-Process Domestic Breakthrough Category

Domestic etch milestones:

• 2019: AMEC CCP etch qualifies for TSMC 7nm, begins small-volume supply
• 2021: Enters TSMC 5nm volume production line
• 2023: AMEC CCP supply to TSMC continues scaling; NAURA ICP in volume at SMIC 14nm

Etch is the fastest-progressing domestic advanced-process category; over the next 5 years, domestic penetration at <7nm nodes domestically is expected to continue rising.

Global etch landscape: Lam Research, AMAT, and TEL together hold ~85%–90% global share; AMEC is becoming a fourth significant force. In 3D NAND HAR ICP etch (the most complex etch category), Lam's Kiyo series has extreme process moats; domestic substitution there is progressing more slowly.

8.3　Thin-Film Deposition: Most Categories, Longest Localization Path

PECVD: Piotech's Polaris-U300 PECVD achieved 28nm volume qualification at multiple Chinese fabs. Key process metrics (film thickness uniformity, refractive index consistency, particle control) are approaching imported tool levels.

ALD: The most difficult deposition sub-category for localization. Piotech's ALD under <14nm customer process verification; distance from volume production scale remains significant. AMAT and Lam have 15+ years of ALD process know-how accumulation.

8.4　CMP: Huahai Qingke's Sole Domestic Breakthrough

CMP global market $2B, dominated by AMAT (Mirra/Reflexion ~45%) and Ebara (JP ~30%). Huahai Qingke with ~20% domestic market share (10%–15% globally) is the sole meaningful domestic substitute. UniForce series' technical highlights are polishing head pressure uniformity and end-point detection (EPD) precision. 28nm/14nm volume verification complete; 7nm node work in progress; CMP consumable (pad + slurry) domestic integration with Dinlong and Anji forming a complete domestic solution.

8.5　Clean: The Highest Domestically-Penetrated Advanced Equipment Category

ACM Research Shanghai's SAPS technology is the technical innovation in single-wafer cleaning: phase-shift megasonic + alternating-phase spray delivers effective particle removal without damaging fine patterns. SAPS 2.0 has passed 14nm verification; <7nm process adaptation in progress. Domestic clean equipment at ~50% penetration is the most commercially mature advanced-process domestic category.

8.6　Metrology and Inspection: Largest Technology Gap Subsector

KLA's metrology moat is not only hardware but software algorithms: 30 years of top global fab production data supporting defect classification accuracy and process-correlation analysis capability that cannot be quickly replicated. FCI's optical inspection covers ≥28nm; breakthrough path requires improving sensitivity, reducing measurement time, and perfecting KLA-format data interfaces for hybrid adoption (partial KLA, partial FCI) with minimal switching friction.

8.7　Ion Implant: The Single Most Difficult Localization Point

Wafer Works pursued ion implant localization through Intevac technology acquisition plus domestic R&D team integration. Products have passed partial SMIC node verification; high-energy (MeV-class) ion implant localization still under attack. Overall domestic penetration ~10%, among the slowest; 2030E domestic penetration target ~20%–25%.

---

Chapter 9　Technology Evolution Trends

9.1　DUV Immersion Lithography: The Near-Term Domestic Realistic Target

Realizing 193nm immersion (ArFi) lithography requires solving several core technical challenges: high-NA projection objective (NA≥1.35 for ≤28nm), ArF excimer laser (193nm, <1ns pulse width, 4kHz+ repetition rate), ultra-pure water immersion system (±0.001°C temperature uniformity), and 6-DOF precision motion stage (<1nm repeatability). Synthesizing these challenges, SMEE achieving commercial volume production of a 28nm 193i scanner is conservatively estimated at 2030–2035, optimistically 2028–2030 (with significant external technical support or key talent inflow).

9.2　EUV Technical Barriers: An Uncrossable Gap in the Short Term

EUV barriers extend beyond ASML itself to the entire ecosystem — from the laser-produced plasma light source (Cymer) to multi-layer EUV mirrors (Carl Zeiss), EUV photoresist (novel chemically-amplified or metal-oxide resist), and EUV masks (HOYA/AGC EUV blanks). China mainland has essentially no EUV-related technology accumulation in any of these sub-systems. High-NA EUV (NA=0.55) first deliveries to customers (TSMC, Samsung, Intel) began in 2024 for sub-2nm R&D. China's workaround: extend DUV immersion with SADP/SAQP multi-patterning toward ~10nm equivalents, and invest in advanced packaging (Chiplet, 3D-IC) to bridge the node gap via heterogeneous integration.

9.3　Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD): Essential Tool for Sub-7nm

ALD's self-limiting surface chemistry enables single-atomic-layer precision. At sub-7nm nodes, HfO₂ HKMG gate dielectric, atomic-layer TiN/TaN barrier, and FinFET/GAA sidewall conformal deposition all require ALD. Technology trends include Plasma-Enhanced ALD (PEALD), Spatial ALD (high-throughput), and Selective ALD (key for GAA structures at sub-2nm nodes). Piotech's ALD roadmap covers PEALD and targets <14nm commercial qualification in the near term.

9.4　GAA Architecture: Extreme Demands on Equipment

From 3nm onward, TSMC and Samsung transition from FinFET to GAA (Gate-All-Around) / Nanosheet transistors. GAA imposes extreme requirements on etch tools (lateral selective etch of ~5nm nanosheet structures) and drives ~30%–50% higher ALD usage per die vs FinFET. For Chinese equipment companies, GAA-compatible tool development is the most important technology positioning for 2025–2030.

9.5　Equipment Intelligence: AI and Digital Twins

AI/ML is being widely applied to predictive maintenance (analyzing hundreds of sensor time series to predict failures), process control optimization, and automatic defect classification. AMAT's AIxONE platform and KLA's Klarity defect classification are industry leaders. Domestic equipment companies are beginning to integrate ML into recipe management and equipment health monitoring, but limited installed base data volume is the bottleneck. As domestic equipment scales up 2024–2026, data accumulation will accelerate meaningfully.

Digital twins (high-fidelity simulation of chamber plasma physics, gas flow, and temperature fields) are increasingly integrated into tool control systems by AMAT and Lam for virtual process recipe pre-validation. Chinese equipment companies are at early stages in digital twin investment.

9.6　Advanced Packaging Equipment: Front/Back Boundary Blurring

As Chiplet, 3D-IC, and HBM adoption grows, front-end tools (lithography, etch, deposition, CMP, clean) are increasingly required in packaging flows (Fan-out WLP, TSV, Hybrid Bonding). This opens a window for Chinese back-end equipment companies: advanced packaging equipment has lower technical barriers than leading-edge front-end tools but higher barriers than legacy packaging — domestic penetration rates can advance significantly in 2025–2030. China's ACM Research Shanghai (cleaning), Huahai Qingke (CMP), AMEC (DRIE for TSV etch) have existing capabilities extending into advanced packaging scenarios.

---

Chapter 10　Risks and Challenges

10.1　US Export Control Escalation: The Largest Structural External Risk

EAR dynamic escalation path: Since October 2022, BIS has expanded controls multiple times — from sub-14nm complete tools to components (RF power, precision valves in specific configurations), extending the FDPR to non-US-made tools using US technology, expanding the Entity List (YMTC, some SMIC subsidiaries), and broadening end-use restrictions on mature-node tool exports.

Worst-case scenario risk: Controls extending to 28nm could cut off supply of lithography (SMEE can't compensate), metrology (FCI not yet ready for advanced), and ALD (almost no domestic solution). The only countermeasure is accelerating full-chain localization before the escalation arrives — Big Fund III's strategic logic precisely. But engineering-driven localization has inherent time limits that cannot be overcome by money alone.

Multilateral coalition trend: Japan (23 equipment categories) and Netherlands (ASML DUV partial) joining the restriction bloc marks a shift from US unilateral to multilateral coalition action. As the US lobbies Germany, Korea, and others for broader restrictions, China's accessible supply sources will continue narrowing. "De-Americanization" at the component level (German VAT valves, Japanese quartz parts) is far harder because those countries face rising US pressure.

10.2　Fab Capex Volatility: Intrinsic Cycle Risk in Equipment Markets

Memory price cycles are the primary driver of capex cyclicality. If AI demand undergoes a phase correction in 2025–2026, or memory supply/demand rebalances, China fab capex plans would adjust accordingly. The risk of domestic equipment oversupply/underutilization is real if downstream capex retreats — especially for mature-process tools where lower technical barriers mean more potential entrants and more intense price competition.

10.3　Mid/Low-End Price War: "Involution" in Mature-Process Localization

As domestic penetration rises in mature-process (≥28nm) categories, growing numbers of domestic equipment vendors are creating nascent price competition in clean, stripping, and some CVD categories. Fabs increasingly use supplier competition to push price concessions; some startup equipment companies bid below cost for first qualifications, disrupting market pricing.

10.4　Technology Generation Gap: Structural Lagging in Lithography and Metrology

Lithography: SMEE ~90nm vs ASML High-NA EUV (2nm) — 10+ process generations apart, ~10–15 year technology gap. This gap does not self-close: SMEE's catch-up speed must exceed ASML's advance rate, which has not occurred in history.

Metrology: KLA's algorithmic moats from 30 years of top-fab production data cannot be quickly replicated. Fabs adopting domestic metrology tools bear yield risk, adding adoption friction.

10.5　Customer Concentration: Dependence on Few Fabs

NAURA, AMEC, and ACM Research Shanghai's top three customers (SMIC, HHGrace, YMTC) typically contribute 50%–70% of revenue. Entity-listed customers (YMTC) have procurement cut off, directly impacting equipment company revenues.

10.6　Persistent Upstream Component Import Dependence

Even as complete-tool localization advances, RF power (20% domestic), precision valves (VAT <10%), quartz parts (30%–40%), and precision ceramics (~20%–30%) remain import-dependent. Until these components are domesticated, "domestic equipment" localization is incomplete, and further EAR escalation to components could halt complete-tool production.

10.7　Talent Shortage: Systemic Gap in Process Engineering

Semiconductor equipment engineer supply-demand gaps persist despite university expansion. The rapid 2022–2025 industry scale-up widened the gap, pushing salaries up sharply and causing frequent inter-company engineer circulation that impairs team stability and R&D continuity. The talent constraint is partially addressable mid-term (3–5 years) through expanded university pipelines and returnee policies, but it remains a real short-term (1–2 year) bottleneck.

---

Chapter 11　2026–2030 Forecast

11.1　Forecast Methodology and Base Assumptions

This chapter's forecast range synthesizes three inputs: demand-side fab capex plans (public guidance and historical trends); supply-side technology maturity (domestic equipment qualification roadmap progress); and policy scenario (US export controls maintained at end-2024 levels as baseline, without further significant tightening or loosening). All forecast numbers are median estimates (base case). Error range is approximately ±15%–20% for 5-year interval forecasts; they should not be read as precise point estimates.

11.2　Global Semiconductor Equipment Market Forecast

2024 ~$109B → 2030E ~$140–170B, CAGR ~7%–10%. Three drivers: AI compute infrastructure investment (LLM training scale expansion driving TSMC/Samsung advanced node capex); global fab geographic diversification (US CHIPS Act ~$52B, EU Chips Act, Japan TSMC JASM); and automotive electronics / industrial semiconductor (EV, ADAS, power semiconductor driving mature-node demand). By region, China mainland's share will likely decline from ~37% in 2024 to ~25%–30% in 2030 as North America, Taiwan/Korea, Japan shares rise, though China's absolute market size should remain $50–60B.

11.3　China Semiconductor Equipment Market Forecast (2026–2030)

Year	China Market (est., $B)	Global Share (est.)
2024	~40	~37%
2025	~49.3 (SEMI actual)	~43%
2026E	~48–53	~36%–40%
2028E	~50–57	~30%–35%
2030E	~52–63	~25%–32%

Domestic equipment revenue forecast:

Year	Domestic Revenue (est., RMB B)	YoY CAGR
2023	~30–35	+40%+
2025	~90–100 (based on listed co. aggregate)	~35%–40%
2027E	~110–140	~20%–25%
2030E	~150–200	~15%–20%

11.4　Domestic Penetration Rate Forecast by Category

Category	2025 Actual	2026E	2028E	2030E
Photoresist stripping	~65%–70%	~72%	~76%	~80%
Single-wafer cleaning	~50%–55%	~58%	~62%	~66%
Etch tools	~30%–35%	~36%	~40%	~44%+
CMP	~28%–35%	~38%	~43%	~48%
Oxidation/diffusion	~30%–35%	~38%	~43%	~48%
PVD	~20%–25%	~28%	~33%	~38%
PECVD	~18%–22%	~25%	~30%	~38%
ALD	~8%–12%	~13%	~18%	~24%
Coater-developer	~10%–12%	~15%	~20%	~26%
Metrology/inspection	~12%–15%	~17%	~22%	~28%
Ion implant	~10%–12%	~14%	~18%	~23%
Lithography	<5%	~5%	~7%	~10% (optimistic)

Key judgments: Etch/clean/stripping will establish domestic-dominant positions (>40%–65%) before 2030; lithography "optimistic 10%" requires SMEE to achieve small-volume 28nm immersion DUV qualification by 2028–2030; ALD and metrology rates depend critically on 2025–2027 process verification progress.

11.5　Policy Scenario Analysis

Base case (controls at 2026-upgraded levels): BIS advanced a new tightening round in H1 2026 ("presumption of denial" draft) but it has not yet become final rule; base case assumes regulations broadly frozen at current level — China mainland can procure mature-node equipment (≥28nm) with continued domestic equipment penetration per the table above. Big Fund III continued deployment of >RMB 164B in 2025 will sustain high R&D intensity at domestic vendors. 2030 domestic equipment revenue ~RMB 150–200B.

Upside (geopolitical relaxation, partial controls ease): faster domestic adoption, 2030 China market potentially $70–80B; domestic penetration rate advance may slow somewhat as import pressure resumes.

Downside (controls extend to ≥28nm): supply disruption across lithography, metrology, and ALD; production capacity constrained to what domestic tools can support; massive additional pressure to accelerate localization.

11.6　Long-Term Structural Judgment

Highly confident: Stripping/clean/CMP/etch will achieve mainstream domestic supply status in domestic fabs (especially mature-process lines) before 2030.

Uncertain: PECVD/ALD/metrology 2030 penetration rates are highly path-dependent on 2025–2027 process verification progress.

Near-certain pessimism: Lithography cannot achieve advanced-node (≤28nm) domestic volume production before 2030; EUV domestic version is not feasible before 2035. This means China's advanced-process capacity will remain constrained by the lithography bottleneck through 2030 — the most difficult-to-bypass structural constraint in the entire domestic equipment localization map.

---

Chapter 12　Conclusions and Research Institute Judgments

12.1　The Fundamental Contradiction in This Sector

Semiconductor equipment is simultaneously the most exciting and the most difficult sector for China's technology industry — these two things are not contradictory; they are two facets of the same reality. It is the most exciting because every domestic etch or CMP tool that replaces an imported tool directly reduces China's dependence on an external critical technology supply chain. It is the most difficult because the technology generation gap between a photoresist stripper and an EUV scanner spans half a century of precision engineering accumulation — and cannot be linearly shortened by piling in capital.

12.2　Five Core Judgments

First: The "staircase" structure of domestic penetration rates is the compass for strategy over the next 5 years. Stripping (65%), cleaning (50%), etch (25%), CMP (20%) are the four categories already on a commercial trajectory, with credible paths to 80%/65%/40%/40% by 2030. Lithography (<5%), metrology (<10%), ALD (<5%) are the genuine generational-breakthrough challenges; credible 2030E targets are 10% (lithography, optimistic), 25% (metrology), 18% (ALD).

Second: The "Big Three" (NAURA + AMEC + ACM Research Shanghai) competitive structure has stabilized; differentiation among the rest will intensify. The Big Three have reached commercially acceptable technology gaps in their primary categories and have formed customer-relationship moats and R&D investment flywheels. Outside the Big Three, Huahai Qingke (CMP) and Piotech (PECVD/ALD) are the most likely candidates to reach Tier-1 status; FCI (metrology) is the one with the highest technical barriers and equally large future potential.

Third: Big Fund III's primary value is not the capital itself — it is the signal. RMB 344B in scale matters, but the main constraint on domestic equipment companies transitioning from R&D to volume production is not money. NAURA has over RMB 20B on its balance sheet; AMEC's net cash position is strong. The more important signal function of Fund III is that it gives fabs (state-enterprise-dominated) explicit national-level authorization to bear more risk in qualifying domestic equipment — accelerating the commercial leap from "trial one unit" to "volume procurement."

Fourth: Upstream components are the most underestimated chokepoint in the localization chain. RF power (~20% domestic) and precision valves (<10%) are the two most urgently needed non-tool breakthroughs. If US controls further extend to cover more components, tool-level "domestic" is incomplete. These two categories receive far less policy attention and industrial resource allocation than their strategic importance warrants.

Fifth: The lithography generation gap is a structural constraint — not a short-term engineering problem. Framing SMEE's 90nm-DUV-to-ASML-EUV gap as "just engineering time" is dangerously optimistic. The core barriers (high-NA projection objective, EUV source, mask ecosystem) are multidisciplinary integrations, the product of decades of coordinated effort by the world's top research institutions across dozens of countries. China's time to independently reproduce this path is longer than any public forecast acknowledges. This judgment is not pessimism — it is a demand that industrial policy invest more real resources in lithography adjacents (domestic 193i DUV, domestic ArF photoresist, multi-patterning process support) rather than generating unrealistic expectations about EUV.

12.3　Research Institute Industrial Observations

Semiconductor equipment localization has never been a smooth linear race — it is multi-category, multi-tempo, multi-institution distributed combat. In every category where commercial breakthroughs have been achieved, the same pattern is readable: 10+ years of R&D accumulation + first-unit policy support de-risking customer adoption + a core engineering team (typically with returnee engineers or former foreign equipment company experience) + one anchor customer willing to bear the early qualification risk. This pattern has validated itself in stripping, cleaning, etch, and CMP; it is validating in ALD, metrology, and coater-developer; it has not yet validated in lithography.

The race's outcome will not be total victory or total defeat — it will be a tiered result: cleaning/etch/stripping are on the winning path; ALD/metrology are still in hard pursuit; lithography, for at least the next decade, will remain the deepest chokepoint.

12.4　Supply Chain Perspective

For B2B procurement and sales decision-makers focused on the semiconductor equipment supply chain, the real challenge is identifying those factories that are genuinely in production with semiconductor-grade precision machining capability. Vacuum pump body machined-parts shops, high-purity aluminum chamber casting mills, quartz part precision finishing shops, RF connector precision manufacturers — these companies are often registered as "mechanical manufacturing" or "electronic components" in business databases, with their actual capabilities not directly visible.

Tianxia Gongchang (www.tianxiagongchang.com), with its database of approximately 4.8 million verified in-production real factories, can precisely filter companies with actual production capacity and semiconductor-grade qualification, distinguishing genuine in-production manufacturers from registered shells. At a time when semiconductor equipment component supply chains are accelerating domestic localization, this factory-level precision identification capability is an effective tool for upstream procurement and sales development.

China's semiconductor equipment industry stands at its most critical historical juncture. The track is hard, but the direction is set. Behind every percentage-point improvement in domestic penetration rates lies the cumulative effort of engineering teams over years. There are no shortcuts, but the journey is underway.

---

Data Sources

The factory entity identification and active-production verification in this report are based on the Tianxia Gongchang (www.tianxiagongchang.com) factory database; industry data are synthesized from the following public sources and cross-verified:

• Industry research institutions and associations: SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International) monthly/annual billings data, CSIA (China Semiconductor Industry Association), IC Insights, Gartner Semiconductor, IDC, Zhiyan Consulting, Huajing Industrial Research Institute, Qianzhan Industrial Research Institute, Gaogong Industry Research (GGII)
• Listed company annual reports and announcements: NAURA (002371), AMEC (688012), ACM Research Shanghai (688082), Huahai Qingke (688120), Piotech (688072), FCI (688361), Jingyuan Electronics (300567), Wafer Works (600641), Mattson/Actel (688228), Jinsheng Electromechanical (300316), Kingsemi (688037), Changchuan Technology (300604), Feilihua (002456), Dinlong (300054), Anji Technology (688019), Nanda Optoelectronics (300346), Huate Gas (688268), Jinhong Gas (688106), Qingyigu Photoelectric (688138), SMIC (688981), HHGrace (688347), Ingenic (688368)
• Overseas listed company reports: ASML (ASML.AS), Applied Materials (AMAT, NASDAQ), Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ), Tokyo Electron (8035.T), KLA Corporation (KLAC, NASDAQ), MKS Instruments (MKSI), Advanced Energy Industries (AEIS), VAT Group (VATN.SW), Edwards Vacuum, Axcelis Technologies (ACLS), Ebara Corporation (6361.T)
• Policy documents: State Council "Several Policies on Promoting High-Quality Development of IC and Software Industry" (2020); National IC Industry Development Guidelines (2014); National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund Phase I/II/III formation announcements (2014/2019/2024); Ministry of Science and Technology "02 Special Project" progress summaries; US BIS EAR October 2022/2023/2024 updates; Wassenaar Arrangement CCL; Netherlands Besluit strategische goederen updates; Japan FEFTA amendment (2023) 23-category equipment controls
• Industry media and public reporting: Semiconductor Intelligence (半导体行业观察), IC Wise (芯谋研究), eefocus.com, Semiconductor Engineering, IEEE Spectrum, EE Times, VLSI Research, TechInsights, Caixin, 21st Century Business Herald, Securities Times; multiple sell-side semiconductor deep-dive reports (Huatai, CICC, GTJA, Huachuang, Tianfeng)

Note: Different institutions apply different scope definitions for the same metric (e.g., "China semiconductor equipment market" under SEMI is ~$36.6–40B; MIIT/CSIA scope at ~RMB 30–35B covers only domestic-origin equipment revenue). This report has labeled sources and scope where relevant, and uses interval expressions where significant divergence exists. Future forecast numbers are model estimates with inherent uncertainty; they are for research reference only and do not constitute investment advice.